THALO.net Home    THALO.net Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hardware Talk    Upgrades -- The doctor is IN
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Upgrades -- The doctor is IN
 Login/Join
 
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted
Rico, I don't exactly have $300 burning a hole in my pocket, but I'm hardware bored. What do you think of this upgrade card for my MDD G4? They dropped the price a hundred bucks. It's a 28% increase in processor speed, which isn't much, but it is two processors (I have just the one 1.25 GHz now) and it has 512K of L2 cache instead of the 256K that I have now. So, WWRD? How much of a speed difference should I expect to see in the real world?
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
It will definitely be faster and handle the latest software better. It will also run Mac OS 9 much faster.

xlr8yourmac only had four reviews to go over. Plug in the the necessary data here. The first one from March 09 is most relevant.

With such an upgrade it would make for a nice Server one day down the road.

$300 is half way to a Mac Mini too. Which would be much quieter and faster.
 
Posts: 5195 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Thank you, Doctor. I don't think the Mac Mini runs OS 9, right? Or is there by now some hack for that?
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
NO Legacy on the Mac Mini that I am aware of. They run Intel CPU's.
 
Posts: 5195 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Dr. Rico, from reading the upgrade stories over at XLR8, I'm going to think twice before trying to install any CPU upgrade myself. Sounds iffy.
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Rico (or anyone), what is the best low-cost ($500.00 or so) color laser printer to buy? Also factor in the cost of consumables. WWRB?
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
Xerox is a good start.

What exactly are you looking for? $500 can get a pretty good workhorse type printer.

I think this is the target to shoot for the Xerox Phaser 6280.

There are a lot to choose from brand wise.

Konica/Minolta
HP
Lexmark
Canon

The HP Laserjet in the office has been a really solid performer. It is not a color Laserjet but you can expect a well built machine from HP.
 
Posts: 5195 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Basically I want the printer in order to do very short run color work. I farm out most of this kind of stuff to a network of suppliers and partners. But a lady came in yesterday and wanted 50 color copies (print-outs, really) of a funeral announcement. Her son had been killed by some dirtbag ex-girlfriend and her friend. I had set up the art and was going to farm it out as usual, but 50 copes is hardly worth it. And I wasn't planning on charging anything. I didn’t. I just put the pdf on a disk and gave it to her. She was really still grieving pretty badly. How can you profit off of that? I would make a horrible funeral director.

But I know when looking for black and white laser printers for the Mac there is often just one definitive model (usually an HP) that everyone had. So, first off, I was asking to find out if there was a consensus color laser printer out there for the Mac. The requirements are PostScript Level III (or emulation) and, obviously, that it works with a Mac. (OS X. I don't expect it to work with OS 9 directly.) I'm guessing there may not be a definitive color laser printer for the Mac, although I'm going to see if I can find that Xerox in the store so I can look at it and see a sample. Thanks for all the info, Rico.
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
I looked through what every one has to offer and I have to say on paper the Phaser 6280 really blows them all away. None of them come close in the price range. Here is a local what looks like a corporate sales company that deal with Xerox. On that page the Phaser 6280 memory wise alone can max out at 1.2GB's. The others are not even close. The standard RAM that the 6280 comes with is as much as the max ram on the others. It has a 400mhz CPU and you can even put a hard drive in it. This all speeds up output. Especially with large files.

The Toner cartridges are pricey. For the standard size for all four costs around $500 and the high capacity ones would set you back $850. You are talking 2500 color prints standard and more than double that for the High capacity cartridges. That is a lot of prints. Xerox claims it comes out to 3 cents B&W and 14 cents color per print.

It features all the appropriate postscript languages.
 
Posts: 5195 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Crap, I hardly have the money to do this, but a buddy of mine had a like-new Samsung SyncMaster 216bw 1680 x 1050 LCD monitor he was selling so I bought it for $200.00. I can actually get larger monitors for less but the new insane fad is for postage-stamp-height monitors that are about a mile wide which I find hardly optimal for general computer work, although they're certainly good for widescreen movies. This 1680 x 1050 is a much more palatable 16:10 aspect ratio. It's fairly minimalist in design. The screen -- of course -- is not high-gloss. I wouldn't buy one of those if you gave it to me for a nickel. It's sharp and the color looks good. I'm not done with fussing with the calibration, but it looks pretty good. This allows we to retire my last CRT monitor (yeah...I'm going green). I had been using an old one as my second monitor used for palettes and stuff. I've rotated over my old Princeton LCD to the right hand palette monitor.
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Thalo talks about RAM in terms of 4, 8, or 16 gigabytes, so I feel like a real rookie when I tell you that I just finally maxed out my G4 MDD to 2 gigs of ram. The reason for this is that we FINALLY have a DTP process going on here, and it requires me having a whole lot more apps open then I typically would. I print from the G4 directly to a plate. It's a small move. I had 1.75 gigs and am adding only 256 MB, but that's something. It was twenty bucks. It certainly didn't break the bank.
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Master Baiter
Picture of thalo
Posted Hide Post
I might have had chips for you in the junk box.

But there's no telling with memory pulled from Seabiscuit. As I recall I had instances where after upgrading firmware, memory wouldn't work on that machine.

Yes, I'm definitely thinking in terms of 16GB chunks of RAM for the new machine. I'd go 32 if I can afford it. What I'm not clear on, maybe brother Rico could illuminate, is why that OWC memory doesn't let you mix and match. So, for example, if I get a 16GB kit from them, I wouldn't be able to fill the 4 open slots with 4 of the 6 GB chips that will come with the Mac, giving me 20GB. OWC says no to that, and I need to know if that's because their memory is crappy or broken or not to spec.
 
Posts: 10659 | Registered: Thu May 01 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
You need to send me a list of what's in your junkbox sometime. Sounds like a treasure trove for someone like me who's a couple revs behind.
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Master Baiter
Picture of thalo
Posted Hide Post
Let's just say, if you go buy any kind of AC adapter, or power cable for older Mac hardware or peripherals, you're nuts. I've got the cables and hub from my old 10-base 2 network. Old keyboards, dead mice. Various chips. A firewire PCI card, maybe dead maybe not. I actually culled through a lot of it, and got rid of old Appletalk crap, ADB cables and that sort of thing. Zip drive for a PC. My toasted superdrive, all kinds of dead or dying hard drives. I think I just need to take it all to the dump. But seriously, a plastic grocery bag FULL of AC adapters. I don't know why I hold onto them. I guess hoping that somehow one will have the right spec to work on something else. Which is retarded, because they never do.
 
Posts: 10659 | Registered: Thu May 01 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Your sack of AC adaptors sounds like my box of power cords. I think they are multiplying.

Actually, any PCI cards you have might intrigue me. I don't even use the FireWire slots I have now, but if you have a USB 2.0 PCI card, I could use that.
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Rico, would you pay $150.00 for this iMac? (Assuming it's in good shape.)

1.8 Gz processor
Power PC G5
L2 Cache 512
Memory 256
Bus speed 600
140 GB hard DRIVE
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
If you were to buy an old iMac I would say get one with an Intel CPU. The G5 CPU is dead in regards to support. Snow Leopard the latest X version will only run on Intel. Plus that is not much RAM. You would have to upgrade the RAM.

So no the $150.00 can be better spent.
 
Posts: 5195 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Okay. Thanks, Rico. It's not like I have $150 burning a hole in my pocket. And I'm not really sure what I'd do with it.
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
Lets bring this topic into the Hardware section.

Upgrade: Netgear GDN3500 Modem/Router/Gibabit Switch combo

It was really painless to set up and just what the Doctor ordered. All I had to do was turn it on login to the router the modem was ready asking what my Password and User name for my DSL was presto connected straight away. Wireless was just as easy. I even set up the MAC address stuff to limit the wifi access to my specific machine.

The Netgear GND3500 was $129. Pricey but it is a three in one device including hard wired Gigabit ethernet which I preferred. Wish I could have held out for one of the Actiontec combos either the V1000H or the newer V2000H but they just do not exist in the retail market. It is a shame as Actiontec has the best product.
 
Posts: 5195 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Gibabit Switch


Dr., aprox. how much faster is gigabit than 10/100?
 
Posts: 17092 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

THALO.net Home    THALO.net Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hardware Talk    Upgrades -- The doctor is IN

© 2005 THALO.net