THALO.net Home    THALO.net Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  The Brother 'Hood    The revolving political thread
Page 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 ... 324
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
5-star Rating (1 Vote) Rate It!  Login/Join 
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
I love this quote from Kyle-Anne Shiver from Palin Has Everything that Counts:

quote:
It wasn't hard to see why Joe Biden has been a Senator and never really in charge of anything on his own.  He came across as someone, who did little more than rehearse a role for public performance.


That's Biden and a whole lot of politicians.

---

I've heard a number of things about the bill that passed that would give Congress more control over the nitty-gritty loan process. I'm not sure that they actually fixed anything, but they've sure dumped a whole lot of money at it and increased Federal control over the free market. And the bill they passed got bloated with all kinds of odd pork: Mona Charen gets into some of the ridiculous earmarks on the new bill: Is this Hoover/Roosevelt redux?

quote:
If scientists were able to determine, beyond doubt, that the sky were actually going to fall on Monday, Oct. 6, Congress would pass legislation containing tax breaks for lobster fisherman in Maine and glue manufacturers in Paducah. It's just what they do.


The Senate version of the financial bailout bill — an emergency measure designed (we thought) to keep the world economy from tumbling into a deep recession — has been ornamented with special favors. Glancing through this bill, you find that Puerto Rican and Virgin Islands rum makers get a tax break, as do certain commercial fisherman and others who were affected by the Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989. Makers of wooden arrows for children's toys are remembered, along with rural schools. There's a duty suspension on wool products, and television production companies get a break on expensing rules. Mental illnesses (including substance abuse) are to receive parity with other disorders in private insurance coverage, and geothermal heat pump systems will get favorable tax treatment. An estimated 24 million middle-class households would be relieved from paying the Alternative Minimum Tax (originally aimed at millionaires). It goes on and on.

Some conservative Republicans dug their heels in on the House bailout bill — which was, gulp, relatively clean compared with this. Now a 100-page bill has become a 450-page monstrosity tarted up with special favors for this one and that one. Did they just walk through Senate offices scooping up old bills and throwing them into the word processor? Some of these provisions may be perfectly good ideas. But isn't the Senate supposed to be the world's greatest deliberative body? Isn't it supposed to hold hearings and debate these things instead of bundling them all up in a "must pass" emergency bill?
 
Posts: 15358 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Master Baiter
Picture of thalo
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Brad and Bozo remind me of what Reece told the young naive Sarah Connor about the Terminator in the original movie:

"It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity. Or remorse. Or fear. And it absolutely will not stop--EVER!"

That comment makes me so proud of them, I literally have a tear in my eye.

Who I'm not proud of, is house republicans, who rolled over and took it up the ass.

Passing that bill was pure, unadulterated corruption. There's not a single Mr. Smith in Washington.
 
Posts: 9112 | Registered: Thu May 01 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Did you friggin' hear O'Reilly tear Barney Frank a new one? I heard a short clip on the Laura Ingraham show this afternoon. He just ripped it (and one assumes it's a fairly flexible a-hole). I like to think I’m eloquent. I can speak my mind. But Bill O'Reilly spoke for me. If I got a change to interview Nancy Pelosi or any of these freakin' Democrats, I would want to do no more than stand up on a chair in front of them and just scream at these idiots. That's what O'Reilly did. I absolutely loved it. We don't tar and feather people anymore. But I understand the instinct. This whole bunch of Democrats should be voted out of office and quite a few Republicans as well. Get 'em out. And a vote for Obama is a vote for the further entrenchment of this bullshit, plain and simple. Voting McCain doesn't solve anything, but it does give us at least a short breather.
 
Posts: 15358 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thalo.net Skeptic
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Passing that bill was pure, unadulterated corruption. There's not a single Mr. Smith in Washington.

Damn straight. The merits of the plan itself aside, the fact that it could be rejected once, and then passed after the $700 Billion bill was loaded up with ANOTHER $150 Billion in pork, "sweeteners"--and bribes--tells us everything we need to know about Congress.

BTW, just as a purely academic exercise, that extra $150 Billion divided by 430 representatives gives us an average figure of nearly $349 Million in bribes for each representative. And if we add the 100 senators to that for THEIR pork, etc., the figure for the entire 530-person Congress is still an average of about $283 Million for each and every one of them.

On top of the original $700 Billion.

Your tax dollars at work.
.
 
Posts: 3205 | Location: Agoura Hills, California | Registered: Sun June 08 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
Last night nearly 70 million tuned in to watch the debate. It is clear all these people tuned in to watch Governor Palin.

In a nutshell Senator Biden bombed. Bombed horribly. He didn't convince a single person to say know what my mind is made up now after hearing him. Governor Palin on the other hand just convinced a huge amount of that 70 million viewers that she does have the chops.

Biden out right lied in many of his answers. That whole bit about Senator Husseins opinion to openly talk with our enemies without preconditions. In the primary debates Hussein was asked that question directly if he would speak with Iran Venezuela Cuba North Korea without pre conditions his answer was yes. How Biden can deny this is absurd especially since he himself was at the debate.

Governor Palin didn't just not make some wild blunder she was expected to do she gave Biden a good swift kick in the dick.

What could Biden say when he is on the record saying Senator Hussein is not ready to lead this nation and he is not ready to be Commander-in-Cheif.
 
Posts: 4188 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Master Baiter
Picture of thalo
Posted Hide Post
Well the fact-checkers have spoken, and while there were only a couple of squeakers for Palin, Biden made some pretty serious ones, mostly about foreign policy. The only one I caught was when he said Hezbollah kicked out of Lebanon by France and the US. I went, "when was that?"

My favorite one is Biden giving his shout out to "Katie's Restaurant" in Wilmington... which it turns out had closed its doors in the 80's. I friggin' love that people check stuff like that.

Oh yeah, I saw O'Reilly lose it with Barney Frank. Priceless. I thought he was going to bust a gasket. I've only seen him that fed up a couple of times. I think he's totally misguided about the bailout plan, and his fears of these magical foreign investors leaving (good). But he's ripping both the Left and Right new ones.

video

Anyone who says Bill O'Reilly favors Republicans should listen to this
 
Posts: 9112 | Registered: Thu May 01 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
Bidens biggest blunder was on the Constitution. The question about the role of the VP he got the whole Article 1 comment wrong. Article 1 describes the Legislative branch not the executive branch as Biden implied.
 
Posts: 4188 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thalo.net Skeptic
Posted Hide Post
.
And Palin fantasized Constitutional provisions about the Vice President that don't exist.

Palin certainly did better than expected. Can't deny reality. But today the Obama side has increased its lead in the polls. That's reality, too.

Say whatever tickles your fancy, Brad and Bozo. The reality on this planet will speak for itself.
.
 
Posts: 3205 | Location: Agoura Hills, California | Registered: Sun June 08 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net prophet
Picture of smithz
Posted Hide Post
Thanks Thalo, I enjoyed that Bill O'Reilly clip. Big Grin
 
Posts: 1014 | Location: Earth | Registered: Fri May 28 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
Last night nearly 70 million tuned in to watch the debate. It is clear all these people tuned in to watch Governor Palin.

Those ratings were pretty amazing indeed.

In a nutshell Senator Biden bombed. Bombed horribly. He didn't convince a single person to say know what my mind is made up now after hearing him.

I don't know that he bombed. Don't let Biden Deranged Syndrome get ahold of you, brother Rico. Remember, there are many people who just viscerally like this guy just as some viscerally dislike Palin. Many people just freak out at how she pronounces her "O's" while falling in love with Democrats who walk to another Station of the Liberal Cross and announce their desire for energy independence while putting a complete embargo on new oil production. Somewhere in all this, it has to matter not the least whether Sarah Palin is good looking or Joe Biden has that cringe-worthy fake grin. Actual facts and policies have to matter (as well as past votes, associations, words, and ideas). And Biden surely did bomb in terms of being honest. But because the mainstream media are on his team, he gets less scrutiny for outright lies. Palin mispronounces a name and people freak out. Biden lies repeatedly about what he and Obama stand for and it's given a pass. But in terms of propping up the ongoing fantasy that liberals have about their vision of America and who the bad guys supposedly are, Biden did okay.

I think the main thing taken from this debate will be that Biden came off as a rather dull technocrat while Palin came off as the fresh, direct-talking reformer. Now, I'll admit that image doesn't always translate to substance. I know that McCain is supposedly the maverick reformer, but he has yet to mention the words central to this economic scandal. And those words are "Applying affirmative action to bank lending practices is a bad idea. And while the worst effects of affirmative action regarding hiring and college admissions are that you openly discriminate against people due to nothing more than their skin color, in those cases only a relatively few people are harmed. The Asians, whites, and others who are discriminated against often have other avenues open toward their goals, as egregious and unfair as this institutionalized racism is. But when you apply affirmative action regarding financial institutions that are involved in about half of the home mortgages being made in this country, you're flirting with disaster. And disaster is just what we have gotten due to misguided liberal policies."

Neither Palin nor McCain have yet said these magic words, or words to their effect. Biden or Obama I don't expect to because, again, their job is to keep feeding the liberal fantasy to people who want to believe it and think it not only works but is just. But clearly Palin wiped the floor with Biden. But I don't think that Biden bombed. He actually could have been much worse. It's just that compared to a fresh, plain-talking face, he looked like the dull, entrenched, technocratic Washington insider that he is. However we fix this mess in Washington, it certainly cannot come from Biden and Obama. I don't expect it to come from McCain or Palin either, but that is our best chance at the moment. Forget all the other sub-issues that are relatively unimportant. Biden and Obama will disastrously raise taxes. When Reagan came into office, the top tax rates under Jimmy Carter were something like 70%. He reduced them to something like 30 to 35% with great results for jobs, economic growth, tax revenues, etc. Both Obama and Biden are of the "punitive" tax mentality. It doesn't matter to them whether or not lowering taxes not only is better for the economy but produces more revenue for the government. They are so heavily mentally and emotionally invested in class envy and class warfare that they cannot resist being punitive. Their very politics are based on an anti-capitalist "soaking it to the rich" mentality. Soaking it to the rich doesn't create jobs. It destroys them. What do you think the rich do with their money, light cigars with it? They will spend it and invest it if there is hope of a good return. But the mindset of Obama and Biden (paying taxes is patriotic?) runs completely counter to what is good for this country. We could turn back to the days of Jimmy Carter malaise and hyperinflation in a heartbeat if these Democrat nitwits are running the country. As far as I'm concerned, the different party's views on taxation are all one needs to know.
 
Posts: 15358 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
quote:


The title of that video is "Bill O'Reilly loses it on Barney Frank." In my opinion, "losing it" would have been socking that asshole in the nose. Just layin' him out (although this was a remote interview). But we need more of this kind of stuff directed at these Democratic flim-flam men...and women. Yeah, it should be done by an elected politician with a bit less shouting, but the outrage and emotion really should be there. What the Democrats have been doing to this country is outrageous, including the Fanny Mae scandal. I just feel like high-fivin' Bill, not tell him to come on down. Besides, O'Reilly was not out of control. He was just pissed. And being pissed in the face of this garbage is the sane response. The insane response, as far as I'm concerned, is wandering around like John McCain stressing the need for bipartisanship. O'Reilly just nails this slimy bastard, and Barney Frank earned every raised syllable of that rant.
 
Posts: 15358 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
I don't remember what Palin said about the Vice Presidency, but Biden once again is out in La-La land regarding what he thinks:

Biden gets veep role wrong

quote:
Democratic vice presidential nominee Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. appeared to incorrectly outline the constitutional role of the job he's seeking in Thursday's debate.

In attacking Vice President Dick Cheney, Mr. Biden said the vice president's only role is to support the president and to preside over the Senate "only in a time when in fact there's a tie vote. The Constitution is explicit."

The Constitution, though, actually says the vice president is always president of the Senate and legal scholars say he has the right to preside at any time. Early vice presidents, such as Thomas Jefferson, actively exercised that role, the vice president still keeps offices at the Capitol, and scholars say it wasn't until the middle of the 20th century that the vice president had an office at the executive office building.

The president pro tempore, usually the senior senator from the majority party, takes over only when the vice president is absent. In recent practice, as the vice president has taken a bigger role in the executive, that's meant the Senate operates almost all of the time without the vice president in the chair.


As far as Biding naming the wrong article of the Constitution, that can be written off a just a misstatement in the heat of a debate. But the role of the VP according to the Constitution is not "to support the president," although part of the VP's role is indeed to preside over the Senate, but not only when there is a tie vote. If Palin or any other VP wanted to, they could preside over the Senate every moment the Senate is in session. I would imagine that whatever Senate rules are in place (or whatever they change them to be they) would define what "presiding" meant.

Palin said:

quote:
"I'm thankful the Constitution would allow a bit more authority given to the vice president if that vice president so chose to exert it in working with the Senate and making sure that we are supportive of the president's policies and making sure too that our president understands what our strengths are," she said


Besides breaking tie votes, that authority surely exist in whatever it means to preside over the Senate. What the Constitution also says in regards to the VP role is in Article II, Section 1:

quote:
In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.


In Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution it says:

quote:
The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.


Note that Article 1 is indeed the article dealing with the Legislative branch. Biden seems to think it a ridiculous idea that the VP has anything to do with the Legislative branch. He said it was strictly an Executive branch position. And he's been a Senator how long?

An article dealing with some of the VP stuff, including the fact that the Framers made no provision for replacing a VP as well as this info:

quote:
The framers also devoted scant attention to the vice president's duties, providing only that he "shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be evenly divided" (Article I, section 3). In practice, the number of times vice presidents have exercised this right has varied greatly. John Adams holds the record at 29 votes, followed closely by John C. Calhoun with 28. Since the 1870s, however, no vice president has cast as many as 10 tie-breaking votes. While vice presidents have used their votes chiefly on legislative issues, they have also broken ties on the election of Senate officers, as well as on the appointment of committees in 1881 when the parties were evenly represented in the Senate.

The vice president's other constitutionally mandated duty was to receive from the states the tally of electoral ballots cast for president and vice president and to open the certificates "in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives," so that the total votes could be counted (Article II, section 1). Only a few happy vice presidents — John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren, and George Bush — had the pleasure of announcing their own election as president. Many more were chagrined to announce the choice of some rival for the office.

Several framers ultimately refused to sign the Constitution, in part because they viewed the vice president's legislative role as a violation of the separation of powers doctrine. Elbridge Gerry, who would later serve as vice president, declared that the framers "might as well put the President himself as head of the legislature." Others thought the office unnecessary but agreed with Connecticut delegate Roger Sherman that "if the vice-President were not to be President of the Senate, he would be without employment, and some member [of the Senate, acting as presiding officer] must be deprived of his vote."

Under the original code of Senate rules, the presiding officer exercised great power over the conduct of the body's proceedings. Rule XVI provided that "every question of order shall be decided by the President [of the Senate], without debate; but if there be a doubt in his mind, he may call for a sense of the Senate." Thus, contrary to later practice, the presiding officer was the sole judge of proper procedure and his rulings could not be turned aside by the full Senate without his assent.

The first two vice presidents, Adams and Jefferson, did much to shape the nature of the office, setting precedents that were followed by others. During most of the nineteenth century, the degree of influence and the role played within the Senate depended chiefly on the personality and inclinations of the individual involved. Some had great parliamentary skill and presided well, while others found the task boring, were incapable of maintaining order, or chose to spend most of their time away from Washington, leaving the duty to a president pro tempore. Some made an effort to preside fairly, while others used their position to promote the political agenda of the administration.

During the twentieth century, the role of the vice president has evolved into more of an executive branch position. Now, the vice president is usually seen as an integral part of a president's administration and presides over the Senate only on ceremonial occasions or when a tie-breaking vote may be needed. Yet, even though the nature of the job has changed, it is still greatly affected by the personality and skills of the individual incumbent.


Clearly the role of the VP role can be that of only "Goes to funerals of foreign leaders" or be more like John Adams or Jefferson. Sarah Palin is correct. Joe Biden seems somewhat ignorant of the history of his own country.
 
Posts: 15358 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thalo.net Skeptic
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I don't remember what Palin said about the Vice Presidency, but ... Sarah Palin is correct.
 
Posts: 3205 | Location: Agoura Hills, California | Registered: Sun June 08 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
Wow Markle you are as good as the media in filtering out content to manipulate your personal reality.

Which is no great surprise for you.
 
Posts: 4188 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I don't remember what Palin said about the Vice Presidency, but ... Sarah Palin is correct.


I don't know if you're just dishonest or stupid, Markle. Maybe both. Clearly I did post in that one post what Palin had actually said, or at least the relevant part of it. Nice Michael-Moore like editing. I would expect no higher standard of integrity from a Democratic. What a putz. I mean, as difficult as facts are to ascertain regarding politics, you attempted to distort something that was there for anyone to read or see, and seemingly without an ounce of care for logic, facts, words, meaning, truth, or mom and apple pie. How can you expect anyone to engage you in intelligent conversation if that's your standard of integrity?

Why don't you, as Rico has said, unstick yourself from stupid and instead of forever defending views you picked up in the 1960's or 70's, learn something new. I mean, you're just as stupid as I've ever seen a person on the internet. And now you're bleeding into dishonesty. What's next?
 
Posts: 15358 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thalo.net Skeptic
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Wow Markle .....

I know it's not as creative as inventing it out of thin air like you do, but we do what we can.
.
 
Posts: 3205 | Location: Agoura Hills, California | Registered: Sun June 08 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thalo.net Skeptic
Posted Hide Post
quote:
How can you expect anyone to engage you in intelligent conversation.....

This thread has become nothing but a platform for knee-jerk partisan screeds, with predictable quotes from right-wing websites, right-wing radio, right-wing TV, right-wing books, right-wing articles, right-wing etc., not to be taken seriously. I have no expectation of "intelligent conversation" here anymore. I'll just deal with it on its own level.
.
 
Posts: 3205 | Location: Agoura Hills, California | Registered: Sun June 08 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
BN
Mockerator
Picture of BN
Posted Hide Post
This thread has become nothing but a platform for knee-jerk partisan screeds, not to be taken seriously. I have no expectation of "intelligent conversation" here anymore. I'll just deal with it on its own level.

This thread, idiot, was just engaged in talking about the Constitution of the United States. Many other internet forum sites talk about cats or engage in pointless and prolonged argument clinic BS. But right here, right now, we're surely talking about something of substance. And all you offer is dishonest editing of quotes and this continued monkey-like "See no evil" disposition that dismisses everything that doesn't fit into your very narrow view of the world. Nicely done. There's certainly no requirement here not to be an idiot, and lucky for you that this is so.
 
Posts: 15358 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Sun May 04 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
THALO.net divinity
Picture of RicoX
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Markle:
quote:
How can you expect anyone to engage you in intelligent conversation.....

This thread has become nothing but a platform for knee-jerk partisan screeds, with predictable quotes from right-wing websites, right-wing radio, right-wing TV, right-wing books, right-wing articles, right-wing etc., not to be taken seriously. I have no expectation of "intelligent conversation" here anymore. I'll just deal with it on its own level.
.


Nothing like your idiotic blathering from all the left wing media you read Markle. You are so quick to judge based on what your own biases. Keep reading news organizations that get there facts from groups with names like ExposeExxon.com as though you are getting your facts from impartial sources. Most recently Tom Brokaw on the air referenced an online blogger who said Jesus was a community organizer and Pilate was a Mayor. What ever journalistic integrity Brokaw had just left the building. Brokaw demonized online bloggers over his pal Dan Rather. So to support his candidate Senator Hussein, Brokaw resorted to lifting language from online bloggers who he characterized as evil.

Your reaction to the facts from the debate only further strengthen that Biden bombed terribly. Biden bombed with the most important voters the swing voters. Those are the ones that win elections.
 
Posts: 4188 | Registered: Sat June 07 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thalo.net Skeptic
Posted Hide Post
.
There is no topic so elevated that it can't be twisted into your ideological box, so that you can declare that your girl, who seems to think Constitutional provisions about the VP are made of rubber, to be bent and molded to please, is therefore "correct." Because everyone on your "side" is always correct.
.
 
Posts: 3205 | Location: Agoura Hills, California | Registered: Sun June 08 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 ... 324 
 

THALO.net Home    THALO.net Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  The Brother 'Hood    The revolving political thread

© 2005 THALO.net